{/ TODO: Screenshot showing Gemini Notebook homepage with the new branding visible in the top-left corner /}
If you opened your NotebookLM dashboard sometime in the last few weeks and saw "Gemini Notebook" where you expected "NotebookLM," you are not imagining things and you have not been moved to a different product. This is a rename, and this article exists to answer the practical questions that a rename actually raises: does anything break, does anything need migrating, and does the tool still do what it did yesterday.
For the full walkthrough of using the product itself — sources, notebooks, Audio Overviews, and workflow patterns — see the Complete NotebookLM Guide. This article is narrower and more specific: it is only about the rebrand.
Before the detail, the table most people actually came here for:
If that table answers your question, you're done. If you want the reasoning behind each row — or you're trying to figure out why your coworker's screen still says "NotebookLM" — keep reading.
Google has spent the last two years consolidating a scattered lineup of AI products — Bard, Duet AI, various Workspace AI features, and standalone tools like NotebookLM — under a single Gemini brand. Gemini now covers the chat assistant, the models themselves, the Workspace integrations, and a growing family of purpose-built apps. NotebookLM was one of the last major holdouts with an independent name, largely because it had built genuine brand recognition on its own — "NotebookLM" showed up in university syllabi, research workflow blog posts, and Reddit threads long before most people had a clear sense of what "Gemini" meant as a family name.
The rename folds NotebookLM into that structure as Gemini Notebook. This is a branding and product-family decision, not a signal that the tool's purpose or architecture changed. NotebookLM's core idea — an AI assistant that only reasons over sources you explicitly give it, rather than the open internet or its general training data — is untouched. That grounded, source-only design is still what distinguishes it from Gemini's general chat mode, and Google kept "Notebook" in the new name specifically to preserve that distinction.
Stripped down to what's verifiably different, the rebrand consists of:
That's the actual list. Everything else — the parts people worry about when a product they rely on gets renamed — did not change, and the next section goes through each of those explicitly.
{/ TODO: Before/after side-by-side comparing the old NotebookLM logo/branding to the new Gemini Notebook branding /}
This is the section worth bookmarking if you're trying to decide whether the rebrand affects your workflow.
Gemini Notebook still works exactly like NotebookLM did: you create a notebook, add sources (PDFs, websites, YouTube videos, Google Docs, audio files), and the AI answers questions, generates summaries, and produces artifacts — Study Guides, Audio Overviews, Flashcards, Quizzes, Mind Maps, Video Overviews — using only what you uploaded. The closed-context design (no open-internet browsing, no unscoped access to your other notebooks) is unchanged. If you knew how to use NotebookLM, you already know how to use Gemini Notebook.
Every notebook you had before the rename is still there, under the same account, with the same sources, the same chat history, and the same generated artifacts. A rebrand is a name and label change at the product level — it is not a data migration, and nothing about your account's underlying data was touched, moved, or reprocessed.
notebooklm.google.com is still the address. Google has not redirected the product to a new domain like gemini.google.com/notebook or similar. Bookmarks, browser autofill, and any documentation that references the notebooklm.google.com URL remain accurate.
If you previously shared a notebook — either with specific collaborators or as a public notebook — those links still resolve to the same content. Nothing about link structure or sharing permissions changed as part of the rename.
The Free / Plus / Pro / Ultra tier structure, sold through Google One AI subscription plans, was not restructured by the rebrand. Whatever tier you were on, and whatever limits applied to it, carried over unchanged. (Google does periodically adjust these plans independent of any rebrand — always check Google's current pricing page for exact figures rather than treating any single article, including this one, as the live source of truth.)
Because the URL and core page structure didn't change, extensions and tools built against NotebookLM's web app kept working. More on this below, since it's one of the most common practical questions.
No. There is no account migration, no re-authentication step, no data export/import, and no setting you need to toggle. If you can sign in at notebooklm.google.com today, you're already on Gemini Notebook with everything intact. The most useful thing to actually do is update your own mental model and any internal documentation — team wikis, onboarding docs, saved links with old screenshots — so new teammates aren't confused by seeing "Gemini Notebook" in the live product after being told to use "NotebookLM."
Nothing changes structurally. Each notebook retains:
If you open a notebook you created six months ago, it looks and behaves the same as it did then, just with "Gemini Notebook" branding around it instead of "NotebookLM."
No, with one clarification worth being precise about: the product's own URL (notebooklm.google.com) has not changed, but Google has been steadily adding cross-links between Gemini Notebook and the broader Gemini app — for example, surfacing a notebook from within a Gemini chat conversation. That's an added entry point, not a replacement for the existing one. The direct URL remains the reliable way to reach the product, and any bookmark, extension, or piece of documentation pointing at notebooklm.google.com is still accurate as of this writing.
This is the question that matters most if your workflow depends on tools that sit on top of NotebookLM rather than Google's own interface.
Browser extensions interact with a web page's actual DOM and URL — not with a product's marketing name. Because Gemini Notebook is still served from notebooklm.google.com with a largely unchanged interface structure, extensions that were built to work with NotebookLM did not need to be rebuilt or reapproved to keep working after the rename. Sourclip, for example — a web clipper and workspace layer that adds capture, export, and organization features on top of the native interface — continued functioning through the rebrand without requiring users to reinstall or update anything specific to the name change.
That said, "the extension still works" and "the extension is still actively maintained for the current product" are different guarantees. When evaluating any NotebookLM/Gemini Notebook extension:
For the full landscape of what's available, see the complete guide to NotebookLM/Gemini Notebook Chrome extensions.
Get clean captures, workspace management, reusable prompts, and easy exports.
Add Sourclip to ChromeNo — and this is worth separating clearly from the rename. NotebookLM/Gemini Notebook pricing is sold through Google One AI subscription tiers (Free, Plus, Pro, Ultra), and that structure existed before the rebrand and continued after it without restructuring tied to the name change. Google does adjust these plans periodically as part of normal product management, completely independent of branding — so if you see a pricing figure that looks different from what you remembered, that's more likely a routine plan update than anything caused by the rebrand. Always confirm current tiers and limits on Google's official pricing page rather than treating a fixed number in any third-party article as current.
To be precise about cause and effect: the following are real, verifiable product changes that arrived in roughly the same window as the rebrand. None of them were caused by the renaming — they're normal feature development that happened to land nearby on the calendar, and treating them as connected to the name change would overstate what actually happened.
If you want the deeper mechanics of any of these, they're covered in context in the Complete NotebookLM Guide and in NotebookLM research workflows. This article intentionally doesn't re-explain them in depth — it exists to separate "what the rebrand changed" from "what happened to change around the same time," which is a distinction most coverage of the rename skipped entirely.
Search behavior and word-of-mouth don't update on a company's press-release schedule. "NotebookLM" accumulated years of search volume, backlinks, Reddit threads, syllabus mentions, and muscle memory before the rename happened, and that momentum doesn't disappear the week a new name ships. A few concrete reasons the old name persists:
Realistically, both names will coexist in search and conversation for a long time, which is why using them interchangeably — as this article and the rest of Sourclip's guides do — is the accurate way to write about the product right now, not an SEO trick.
The honest answer: it mostly doesn't, functionally. But the framing differs slightly by how deeply each group is embedded in the tool.
Researchers relying on NotebookLM for literature synthesis, competitive analysis, or long-running research notebooks should treat the rebrand as a non-event for their actual workflow — see NotebookLM research workflows for the underlying methodology, which is entirely unaffected. The one practical note: if you cite the tool in published methodology sections or research notes, consider naming it as "Gemini Notebook (formerly NotebookLM)" going forward so the reference stays accurate as the old name fades from common use over the next few years.
Students using NotebookLM as a study system — generating Study Guides, Flashcards, and Quizzes from course materials — will see the new branding but no change to the underlying study workflow described in NotebookLM for students. If your university's course guides or your own notes reference "NotebookLM," they're still accurate; you're just looking at a relabeled version of the same tool.
Professionals using it for meeting prep, client research, or decision briefs (see NotebookLM for professionals) should note one thing worth double-checking: if your organization has any internal policy documentation, security review, or approved-tools list that references "NotebookLM" by name, it's worth confirming with your IT or compliance team that the policy is understood to cover the renamed product — not because the product changed in a way that affects security posture, but because internal approval lists sometimes lag behind vendor renames in ways that cause unnecessary friction later.
If you take one thing from this article: the rebrand from NotebookLM to Gemini Notebook is a naming and branding change, not a product transition. Nothing was migrated because nothing needed migrating — it's the same product, same account, same data, same URL, reached the same way it always was. The practical work, if there is any, is entirely about updating your own references and expectations, not about anything Google requires you to do on your account.
For the complete product reference, start with the Complete NotebookLM Guide. For getting content and artifacts out of your notebooks, see the export guide. For the extension ecosystem built on top of the product, see NotebookLM Chrome extensions.